Objectives
When you have finished this section, you will be able to
§
use relative clauses in order to present
sentence variety;
§
write complex sentences;
§
avoid repetition;
§ recognize and
utilize word families .
Resource List
1) Introduction and usage in defining clauses:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/645/01/
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/645/01/
2)
Relative pronouns in non-defining clauses:
3) Defining and non-defining clauses, and ESL Tips:
4)
Academic Word Lists:
Key Concepts
§
Relative clauses
§ Defining
clauses
§ Non-defining
clauses
§ Relative
pronouns
§
Word families
Procedure
This section
falls during E-learning Week.
Complete Tasks A to D
The answers
for each task are provided at the end of the unit except for A3 and B3 which will be checked in the first class the following week.
Tasks
A. Relative Clauses
In
order to avoid writing numerous short sentences with repeated vocabulary, more
accomplished writers use relative clauses.
Relative clauses formed with
relative pronouns. The most common relative pronouns are who, whom,
whose, which, and that.)
Look at this example.
Globalisation
is a recent phenomenon. Globalisation affects almost every country in the
world.
The use of relative
clauses results in longer complex sentences without repetition, as well as text
restructuring. The two simple sentences above, when combined, become:
Globalisation, which
affects almost every country in the world, is a recent phenomenon.
A1 Recognising types of relative clauses
Look at the sentences in
Table 1 and answer the questions that follow.
Table 1: Clause Guide
1.
Joseph Stiglitz is an author
|
who
|
is
a leading critic of globalization.
|
2.
Globalization is the process
of international integration
|
that
which
|
|
3.
Joseph Stiglitz is an author
|
Æ
that
who
whom
|
many
people respect because he used to be the Chief Economist at the World Bank.
|
4.
Globalization is the process
of international integration
|
Æ
That
which
|
|
5.
Bermuda is a country
|
whose
|
economy
is based on it being a tax haven.
|
6.
A tax haven is a place
|
where
|
taxes
are levied at a low rate, if at all.
|
who
|
wrote The
Consequences of Modernity, defines globalization as the intensification of worldwide social relations.
|
|
8.
The four basic aspects of
globalization,
|
which
|
were identified
by the International
Monetary Fund in
2000, are trade and transactions, capital and investment movements,
migration, and the dissemination of knowledge.
|
(a) Can you work
out when the zero ( Æ ) relative pronouns can
be used?
(b) What do you
notice about sentences 5 and 6?
(c) How are sentences 7 and 8 different from the
first six?
Read
Tables 2 & 3 to check your
answers.
Table 2: Two types of
relative clauses – Defining and Non-defining
Defining
|
Non-defining
|
Gives
essential information
|
Gives
extra information
|
No
commas
|
2
commas (or a comma and a full stop)
|
Who,
which, where, whom, whose, that,
|
Who,
which, where, whom, whose
|
The
relative pronoun as the object of a relative clause can be omitted
|
The
relative pronoun cannot be omitted
|
Spoken
and written
|
Written
|
Table 3: Defining Clauses – Subject
or Object
Subject
|
Object
|
People – Who,
that
|
People – Who,
that, whom,
whose
(can’t be omitted)
|
Things – Which,
that
|
Things – Which, that,
where, when (can’t be
omitted)
|
A verb follows the relative pronoun
|
A (pro)noun comes between the relative pronoun and the verb
|
A2 Working
with Relative Pronouns
Read Article 1 below and take
note of the relative
pronouns. As you encounter the
pronouns, ask yourself these questions:
(a) Can any of these words be replaced by a
different relative pronoun?
(b)
Which are non-defining?
Article 1
UN must challenge
Canada's complicity in mining's human rights abuses: Canada is due for review
at the UN human rights council – abuses by its mining companies must not be
overlooked
1)
Canada is scheduled for
its universal periodic review (UPR) at the UN human rights council on 26
April. The UPR is an international mechanism established in 2006 to hold
governments accountable for their human rights records. According to Ban
Ki-moon, the review has the potential "to promote
and protect human rights in the darkest corners of the world".2) When Canada stands before the UN to have its "darkest corners" examined, the international community must not turn a blind eye to its complicity with a global mining industry whose corporations are among the worst human rights and environmental offenders in the world. 3) The abuses by Canadian mining companies are a systemic part of an economic development policy that disregards human rights and disdains the environment. This helps to explain why Canada is now home to 75% of the world's mining companies, the majority operating overseas. The Canadian government has accelerated its pursuit of investment treaties in the global south to serve the interests of the extractive industry. These treaties allow companies to challenge environmental, public health or other resource-related policies that affect mining profits. 4) At the same time, Canada allows its corporations to benefit from a climate of impunity, offering no legal recourse for adversely impacted communities and demanding no accountability in exchange for generous public subsidies, as the EU and other jurisdictions do. These conditions have made Canada a haven for the global mining industry. 5) Canadian mining companies are operating at the heart of violent conflicts around the world. Although the industry often claims the violence is localised and specific, there is an unmistakable pattern of social conflict surrounding mining projects. Anti-mining activists are being brutally attacked and killed for voicing their opposition to mega-mining project in communities throughout the global south. Yet impacted communities have been unsuccessful in bringing their cases to Canadian courts. 6) Last year, a Québec court of appeal rejected a suit by citizens of the Democratic Republic of the Congo against Montreal-based Anvil Mining Limited for allegedly providing logistical support to the DRC army as it carried out a massacre, killing as many as 100 people in the town of Kilwa near the company's silver and copper mine. The supreme court of Canada later confirmed that Canadian courts had no jurisdiction over the company's actions in the DRC and it rejected the plaintiffs' request to appeal. Kairos Canada, thought the the supreme court's ruling would "have broader implications for other victims of human rights abuses committed by Canadian companies and their chances of bringing similar cases to our courts". 7) In an increasingly water-hungry world, much of the community resistance to Canadian mining has been in defence of local water supplies. Mining projects require tremendous amounts of water and employ methods that contaminate precious water resources. A recent report by Earthworks and MiningWatch Canada found that 180 million tonnes of hazardous mine waste was being dumped every year into lakes, rivers and oceans worldwide. 8) In El Salvador, where more than 60% of the population relies on a single source of water, this means choosing between drinking water and mining. In 2009, after immense public pressure, the country chose water. It established a moratorium on metal mining permits. Polls show that a strong majority of Salvadorans would now like a permanent ban. 9) In Chile, after community resistance to a massive silver-gold project by Canadian mining giant Barrick Gold, an appeals court recently ordered a suspension of operations as the project was polluting surface and groundwater in the Atacama desert, one of the driest regions in the world. 10) Yet, in a globalised world, these victories are precarious. Even if corporations are found in violation of domestic laws, or if communities reject destructive resource projects, mining companies are able to use bilateral investment treaties to plough ahead, or to demand compensation for "lost" profit. 11) Vancouver-based Pacific Rim, which describes itself on its website as "an environmentally and socially responsible exploration company whose business plans and management talent focus on high grade, environmentally clean gold deposits in the Americas", is suing El Salvador through a World Bank trade tribunal for $315m (£207m) for refusing permits for a gold mine in the Department of Cabanas. 12) Canada is pursuing a trade agreement with El Salvador that would further entrench the rights of mining corporations and make a mining ban virtually impossible. A similar battle is being played out in neighbouring Costa Rica where Calgary-based Infinito Gold is threatening to sue for $1bn if two supreme court rulings affirming the country's ban on opencast mining are not overturned. And in Chile, the battle continues as Barrick Gold evaluates its legal options. 13) As noted by the UN Conference on Trade and Development, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ruled human rights must not undermine investor protection in judging a dispute between French multinational water company SAUR and the government of Argentina in 2012. 14) It is time that international human rights bodies challenged this logic. The example of Canadian mining underscores the urgent need for the Human Rights Council to defend the primacy of human rights. If global human rights mechanisms do not confront the logic of international corporate rights championed by states like Canada, they risk becoming irrelevant. ![]()
Barrick Gold's processing plant at the Pacua-Lama mine
on the border of Chile and Argentina. Photograph: Reuters
|
A3 Using relative clauses
Re-write the following extracts from the article with relative
clauses.
(a) Canada allows its corporations to benefit from
a climate of impunity, offering no
legal
recourse for adversely impacted communities and demanding no
accountability in exchange for generous public subsidies, as
the EU and other
jurisdictions do. These conditions have made Canada a haven for the
global mining
industry.
(b) The example of Canadian
mining underscores the urgent need for the Human
Rights
Council to defend the primacy of human rights. If global human rights
mechanisms do not confront the logic
of international corporate rights
championed by states like
Canada, they risk becoming irrelevant.
(c)
This helps to explain why Canada is now home to 75% of the world’s mining
companies,
the majority operating overseas. The Canadian government has
accelerated its pursuit of
investment treaties in the global south to serve the
interests of the extractive
industry.
Write
five sentences using defining and non-defining relative clauses, leaving a
space for the answer which your partner will try and complete in the next class.
Example
____________
was an event which resulted in a worldwide decline of international tourism
by 4.2% in 2009.
B. Word Families
B1 Changing word forms to avoid
plagiarism
Example
Original
text …that would
further entrench the rights of mining corporations and make a mining
ban virtually impossible.
Rewritten text …that would
further entrench the rights of mining corporations, making a mining ban a virtual
impossibility.
Complete the table
below.
For
some boxes, no answers are possible, while for others there is more than one
possibility.
Vocabulary
item and *part of speech
|
Different
word form and *part of speech
|
Synonym
|
be global
|
some globalisation
|
be international, be worldwide
|
be ubiquitous
|
|
|
an economy
|
|
|
a profit
|
|
|
a / some migration
|
|
|
an advantage
|
|
|
a / to link
|
|
|
a critic
|
|
|
a / to decline
|
|
|
Key
a(n) + countable noun be + adjective
some + uncountable noun to + verb
NB: Though go down
is a synonym of decline, it is an example of a phrasal verb. These are
regarded as being informal and should be avoided in formal academic writing.
Some common suffixes
Nouns -ment -ity -hood
-ship -tion -er/-or
-ness
Adjectives -ive -al
-ous
-ish -able/-ible -ful/-less
Verbs -ify -ize/-ise
B2 Pronunciation
– suffixes and word stress
§ The stress
moves to the syllable before some suffixes: ’global / globali’sation
§
Some suffixes have no effect on the stress:
‘punish / ‘punishment
§
Very few suffixes are stressed: millio’naire
B3
Integrating the Techniques
Read the text below and make
notes on the following.
§ Should the
fashion retailers be obliged to sign the initiative?
§ If companies
don’t sign, should they be blacklisted?
§ Should the
garment workers be allowed to form trade unions without the permission of the
factory owners?
Then use the
techniques you have covered to condense the article into a single paragraph.
Eight top fashion retailers fail to
sign Bangladesh safety accord
The accord on building safety in
Bangladesh has been signed by Primark, Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, Zara and
Tesco
![]() |
Workers outside a building in Dhaka,
Bangladesh, that housed a clothing factory which, caught fire.
Tuesday 14 May 2013
Photograph: Ismail Ferdous/AP
|
At least eight of the UK's leading fashion retailers had last night failed to put their names to a
legally binding initiative to offer financial support for fire safety and
building improvements in the wake of the Bangladesh garment disaster.
George at Asda, Next, Matalan, River Island, Sports Direct, Peacocks, Shop
Direct and the Arcadia group – which includes Topshop, Bhs and Dorothy Perkins
– all failed to meet a deadline set by NGOs and labour leaders to sign the
pledge.
The accord on fire and building
safety in Bangladesh, which has been signed by H&M, Primark, C&A, Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, Zara and Tesco, aims to compel retailers to pay for rigorous and
independent public inspections and blacklist any factories unwilling to comply.
Last
night a handful of other retailers did sign up before the deadline, including Marks
& Spencer, Sainsbury’s, New Look and N Brown, a mail order and online
retailer whose brands include High & Mighty, Marisota and figleaves.com.
The decision by the handful of
retailers not to sign up was criticised by campaigners, who said it undermined
any ethical initiatives the companies may have. Sam Maher from Labour Behind
the Label said: "I think they are running out of excuses. No company can
say they have their workers’ interests at heart if they can't sign up.
"If H&M, Tesco and M&S
can sign why can't Next and Arcadia? They have production in Bangladesh and
have just as much responsibility to invest in those factories and ensure those
workers are safe. Those that have signed have proved this is not an impossible
demand. Are 1,200 dead workers not enough to make them realise something needs
to be done?"
The Ethical Trading Initiative, the
UK's biggest alliance of businesses, trade unions and voluntary organisations,
which aim to improve working conditions, has recommended its members sign up to
the accord. Debenhams, Next and George at Asda are all members of the ETI but
have yet to sign up.
A spokesman for Debenhams said:
"We fully agree with the intent of the agreement (but) we believe a
collaborative approach to issues in Bangladesh is right. We continue to work
through the Accord agreement and have provided feedback to the ETI." The
company sources less than 10% of its stock from Bangladesh and confirmed it had
never used the collapsed Rana Plaza complex.
George at Asda, which is owned by US
group Walmart, said about 20% of its clothes come from Bangladesh. George did
not use the Rana Plaza building, but Walmart refused to confirm or deny whether
it sourced clothes there, only saying that no "authorised" production
took place there. A spokeswoman said: "We are making investments into
increasing wages, promoting female empowerment, supporting communities, health
and safety initiatives and better working conditions."
Next declined to comment, but
sources suggested the company could sign up later this week. The failure to
meet the deadline by some of the biggest fashion names in the UK comes less
than a day after the Bangladeshi government agreed to allow the country's 4
million garment workers to form trade unions without permission from factory
owners.
Arcadia group, owned by billionaire
Sir Philip Green, said it was unaware of the agreement and had not been
approached by the ETI. A spokeswoman said: "We are not members of the ETI
but have our own robust and comprehensive ethical trading programme and a
resultant code of conduct." She confirmed that the company did not use the
Rana Plaza building and it is understood the business has no plans to sign up.
Matalan, which used suppliers in the
building as recently as February this year, said it would not be signing up to
the agreement, but said it is part of a different non-binding agreement.
Philip Jennings, general secretary
of UNI Global Union, which helped draft the proposals,
said, "The clock is ticking for
companies to show they care about their Bangladeshi supplier workforce. Their
corporate reputations may be on the line but more importantly, so are the lives
and livelihoods of these vulnerable factory workers in Bangladesh."
Shop Direct said it will not sign but is working with the International Labour Organisation instead. A spokeswoman added: "We trust their judgement and will continue to follow their actions closely." Sports Direct declined to comment but said a very small number of products come from Bangladesh. Peacocks and River Island were unavailable.
C. Extra Activity
Delete
the extraneous information in each sentence:
(a) The robbery
was committed by a pair of identical twins. Both are aged 20.
(b)
The runner-up in second place is Linda Lewis.
(c)
Storansay is an island surrounded by sea.
(d)
Thanks for the signed autograph.
(e)
It’s four minutes to eight. That’s the time.
(f)
The record is 38 seconds and that’s the best
time ever.
(g)
He’ll have that recurring dream again and again.
(h)
I hope we can fight again or have a re-match.
(i)
Within a couple of minutes he scored two goals
within a two minute period.
(j)
After a goalless first half, the half-time score
is 0 – 0.
(k)
It’s been an amazing year for him over the last
twelve months.
(l)
My father was a miner and he worked in a mine.
(m) Lap 53, the penultimate last lap but
one.
(n)
In first place there’s an absolute dead heat tie.
Source:
Private Eye.(1982). Colemanballs. London:
Private Eye.
Answers
A1 Look at the sentences in Table 1
(a) Can you work out when the zero ( Æ ) pronouns
can be used?
With
object defining clauses
(b) What do you notice about sentences 5 and 6?
Exceptions
to the above. Whose and where can’t be replaced by Æ
(c) How are sentences 7 and 8 different
to the first 6?
They
are non-defining relative clauses
A2 Take note of
the relative pronouns in Article 1.
(a) Can any take a different pronoun?
(b) Which are non-defining?
The
abuses by Canadian mining companies are a systemic part of an economic
development policy that / which disregards
human rights and disdains the environment. This helps to explain why Canada is now home to 75% of the
world's mining companies, the majority operating overseas. The
Canadian government has accelerated its pursuit of investment treaties in the
global south to serve the interests of the extractive industry. These treaties
allow companies to challenge environmental, public health or other
resource-related policies that affect mining profits.Mining projects require tremendous amounts of water and employ methods that / which contaminate precious water resources.
In El Salvador, where more than 60% of the population relies on a single source of water, this means choosing between drinking water and mining. Non-defining
Vancouver-based Pacific Rim, which describes itself on its website as "an environmentally and socially responsible exploration company whose business plans and management talent focus on high grade, environmentally clean gold deposits in the Americas", is suing El Salvador through a World Bank trade tribunal for $315m (£207m) for refusing permits for a gold mine in the Department of Cabanas. Non-defining
Canada is pursuing a trade agreement with El Salvador that / which would further entrench the rights of mining corporations and make a mining ban virtually impossible. A similar battle is being played out in neighbouring Costa Rica where Calgary-based Infinito Gold is threatening to sue for $1bn if two supreme court rulings affirming the country's ban on opencast mining are not overturned.
A3 Re-write the following extracts with relative
clauses
Canada, which is a haven for
the global mining industry, allows its corporations to
benefit from a climate of impunity,
offering no legal recourse for adversely impacted
communities and demanding no accountability in exchange for generous
public
subsidies, as the EU and other jurisdictions do.
or
Canada, unlike the EU, allows its multinationals to behave with
impunity, which is
why Canada is a haven for mining companies.
If global human rights mechanisms do
not confront the logic of international
corporate rights championed by states like Canada, they risk becoming
irrelevant, which the example of Canadian mining underscores.
The Canadian government, which
has accelerated its pursuit of investment treaties in
the global south to serve the interests of the extractive industry, has
helped to make
Canada home
to 75% of the world's mining companies, the majority operating
overseas.
or
Canada’s government is vigorously pursuing
investment treaties, which allow
companies to challenge policies that affect mining profits, in the
global south to serve
the interests of the industry.
Example
SARS was an event which resulted in a
worldwide decline of international tourism… .
B1 Word families http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/dictionary/criticize
Vocabulary
item and *part of speech
|
Different
word form and *part of speech
|
Synonym
|
be ubiquitous
|
some ubiquity
|
be common, be widespread
|
an economy
|
be economical / be
economic / to economize
|
be frugal, be
profitable
|
a profit
|
to profit / be
profitable
|
be economic, be
rewarding
|
a / some migration
|
to migrate / be
migratory
|
-
|
an advantage
|
be advantageous / to
advantage (rarely used)
|
be beneficial
|
a / to link
|
a/some linkage
|
to connect / a connection
|
a critic
|
be critical / to
criticize (criticise)
|
be crucial
|
a / some / to decline
|
-
|
a / some / to decrease
a / to fall
|
B3 Condense the article
into a single paragraph
Despite
the Ethical Trading Initiative ‘s prompting, many of the British clothing
retailers have yet to sign an initiative which would compel them to provide aid
for improving and making buildings fireproof. The retailers would also finance
inspections which could result in non-compliant companies being boycotted. 43 words
C. Extra Activity
Delete
the extraneous information in each sentence:
The robbery was committed by a pair
of identical twins. Both are aged 20.
The runner-up in second place is
Linda Lewis.
Storansay
is an island surrounded by sea.
Thanks
for the signed autograph.
It’s four minutes to eight. That’s
the time.
The
record is 38 seconds and that’s the best time ever.
He’ll
have that recurring dream again and again.
I
hope we can fight again or have a re-match.
It’s
been an amazing year for him over the last twelve months.
My
father was a miner and he worked in a mine.
Lap
53, the penultimate last lap but one.
58%
of all cars coming into the UK are imported.
In
first place there’s an absolute dead heat tie.
Source:
Private Eye.(1982).Colemanballs. London:
Private Eye.
No comments:
Post a Comment